SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

September 2006

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailling list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 8 Sep 2006 09:18:16 -0400
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Vinod Gupta <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject:
From:
Vinod Gupta <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
Comments:
To: Ioannis Vranos <[log in to unmask]> cc: "Stephen A. Smith" <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
On 9/8/2006 7:22 AM, Ioannis Vranos wrote:
> Stephen A. Smith wrote:
>> on a separate note, how do the Core Duo chips compare to the 
>> pentiumD? both are dual-core chips, but are the Core Duos able to 
>> crunch numbers
>> faster?  
>
>
> It depends on the application. If it is a multithreading one (uses 
> multiple threads at the same time), then it takes advantage of more 
> than one processors or cores, that are available.
>
> Also individual applications will be shared among the multiple 
> processors or cores.

Core Duo have many enhancements, though onchip GPU may be irrelevant for 
your number crunching.
http://www.intel.com/products/processor_number/proc_info_table.pdf might 
help for a quick comparison.

Vinod

ATOM RSS1 RSS2