SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 16 Jan 2014 15:02:59 -0800
Reply-To:
"Patrick J. LoPresti" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Patrick J. LoPresti" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Konstantin Olchanski
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> I find it puzzling that official announcements say nothing
> about CentOS trademarks, copyrights, etc being transferred
> to Red Hat - as that web page seems to imply.

It is also mentioned in Red Hat's FAQ:

http://community.redhat.com/centos-faq/#_centos_trademark

I find it somewhat interesting how much digging and "reading between
the lines" is required to learn what actually happened here, when it
can be fully summarized in four words: Red Hat bought CentOS.

But apparently, signing an employment agreement is "joining forces"
and selling your trademark is "transfering it for stewardship". 2014
indeed.

 - Pat

ATOM RSS1 RSS2