SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

April 2005

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailling list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 21 Apr 2005 14:37:13 -0400
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Content-type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject:
From:
Todd Blake <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Unfortunately on all the machines, one of which I *know* to be rc2, and one 
machine which is 4.0 final, I see the same thing:


RC2 Machine:
# cat /etc/redhat-release
Scientific Linux SL Release 4.0 (Beryllium)

Final Machine:
# cat /etc/redhat-release
Scientific Linux SL Release 4.0 (Beryllium)


On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Todd Blake wrote:


 >> Since I haven't been keeping track, does anyone know of a good way to determine
 >> which SL install I may have on a box?  I've several of them, some rc1, some 
rc2,
 >> some alpha.
 >>


 > cat /etc/redhat-release

ATOM RSS1 RSS2