SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

November 2009

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailling list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:15:44 -0500
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"John A. Stewart" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject:
From:
"John A. Stewart" <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
Comments:
Resent-From: "John A. Stewart" <[log in to unmask]> Originally-From: "John A. Stewart" <[log in to unmask]> To: Scientific Linux Users <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
I would expect problems to be more likely if you are trying to upgrade 
two or more releases at a time.   Red Hat would certainly have tested 
5.3 to 5.4 upgrades but how much testing would they have done on 5.1 to 
5.4?   For all we know, it might not have been tested at all.  Yes, it 
would be a pain having to do three separate upgrades to get to 5.4, but 
if it was my decision that is what I would do.

-- 
John Stewart -- Mathematics & Statistics, Carleton University
Internet: [log in to unmask]                       613-520-2600x3707
"Take time to stop and pick the blueberries."

ATOM RSS1 RSS2