Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 10 Jan 2014 07:01:30 -0800 |
Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Excellent feedback guys!
Thank you all so much!!! :)
Jeremy
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> AD is fine with a delegated domain. Allow zone transfers so the BIND
> server can generate reverse DNS with "mkrdns"
>
> Nico Kadel-Garcia
> Email: [log in to unmask]
> Sent from iPhone
>
> > On Jan 9, 2014, at 21:37, Jeremy Wellner <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> >
> > That's a resounding stay the course and I don't mind that one bit. It's
> been rock solid and I've been happy with it.
> >
> > So as a secondary question, we are planning on adding Active Directory
> in to our network and I know that it is very particular about it's DNS.
> Will AD be happy with being given a delegate domain to have as it's
> sandbox or does that throw my BIND install out the window?
> >
> > Thank you all for the advise!! :)
>
--
Jeremy Wellner
Technology Group
Stanwood-Camano School District
[log in to unmask]
Internal: x4357
External: 360-629-1205
Cell: 360-420-5486
“We’re here to put a dent in the universe. Otherwise why else even be here?”
-Steve Jobs
|
|
|