SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeremy Wellner <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jeremy Wellner <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 10 Jan 2014 07:01:30 -0800
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1086 bytes) , text/html (1918 bytes)
Excellent feedback guys!

Thank you all so much!!! :)

Jeremy


On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> AD is fine with a delegated domain. Allow zone transfers so the BIND
> server can generate reverse DNS with "mkrdns"
>
> Nico Kadel-Garcia
> Email: [log in to unmask]
> Sent from iPhone
>
> > On Jan 9, 2014, at 21:37, Jeremy Wellner <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> >
> > That's a resounding stay the course and I don't mind that one bit.  It's
> been rock solid and I've been happy with it.
> >
> > So as a secondary question, we are planning on adding Active Directory
> in to our network and I know that it is very particular about it's DNS.
>  Will AD be happy with being given a delegate domain to have as it's
> sandbox or does that throw my BIND install out the window?
> >
> > Thank you all for the advise!! :)
>



-- 
Jeremy Wellner
Technology Group
Stanwood-Camano School District
[log in to unmask]

Internal: x4357
External: 360-629-1205
Cell: 360-420-5486

“We’re here to put a dent in the universe. Otherwise why else even be here?”
-Steve Jobs


ATOM RSS1 RSS2