SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

November 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-type:
multipart/signed; boundary="Signature=_Thu__29_Nov_2007_08_09_16_-0600_uF4pMvwqDbnsQ6HQ"; micalg=PGP-SHA1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Sender:
Mailling list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Netscape Navigator 9.0.0.4
From:
Przemysław Pawełczyk <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:09:15 -0600
MIME-version:
1.0
Comments:
To: [log in to unmask]
Reply-To:
Przemysław Pawełczyk <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (586 bytes) , application/pgp-signature (194 bytes) 
Hi,

I've read the thread about "Security ERRATA for firefox on
SL5.x, SL4.x, SL3,x i386/x86_64" and I'd like to know if you've tried to
use Netscape Navigator for Linux (NN 9.0.0.4 = FF 2.0.0.10)? I run it on
Debian now but I'd like to know if there are any problems on SL 5.0? The
Navigator's archive uncompresses fine to only one directory (e.g. /opt),
is stable, lighter than FF, and accepts all add-ons for FF >= 2.0. For
me it beats FF on all grounds.

I appreciate any comments.

Regards,
pp

--
Przemysław Pawełczyk (P2O2) - [log in to unmask]
WWW: http://pp.kv.net.pl/ Forum: http://www.p2o2.fora.pl/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2