SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

July 2004

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailling list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 13 Jul 2004 15:04:41 -0500
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Content-type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject:
From:
In-Reply-To:
<1089746652.18953.6.camel@kenny>
Comments:
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (27 lines)
John,

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, John Rowe wrote:

> First, thanks to everyone involved in this for scratching an itch that
> I'm sure a lot of us have.
>
> Is there a policy on creating and releasing updated rpms as updated
> srpms are released by, cough, you-know-who?

Not a written policy.  But a informal one.  I wait a few days for the dust
to settle and then put them up in
scientific/linux/30?/arch/errata/SL/RPMS/

I wait a few days to make sure that the rpm does not break anything.  If
there is a big network exploitable rpm I will put that up sooner.

>
> Thanks again.
>
> John Rowe
> School of Physics
> University of Exeter
> UK
>
-Connie Sieh

ATOM RSS1 RSS2