SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

December 2009

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailling list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:48:42 +0100
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Matthias Schroeder <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1
Subject:
Re: glib2-2.12.3-4.el5_3.1.x86_64 and /lib64/libglib-2.0.so
From:
Matthias Schroeder <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
Comments:
To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]> cc: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines) 
Ron Rechenmacher wrote:
> Hi,
> On my SL5 x86_64 machine, I tried to build a package that wanted 
> libglib-2.0 and it could not build because although 
> /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0 exists, the sym link /lib64/libglib-2.0.so did 
> not. The rpm that /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0 belongs to is 
> /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0.  Should the install of this rpm create the 
> link? Assuming so, could someone check to see if it does or not.
> I created the link myself so that my software builds, but I would like 
> to know if my system somehow deleted the link.

The rpm that should provide libglib-2.0 is glib2-devel.

Hope this helps,

Matthias

> Thanks,
> Ron

ATOM RSS1 RSS2