SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2021

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Miles ONeal <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Miles ONeal <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 25 Jan 2021 23:31:08 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (862 bytes) , text/html (1639 bytes)




________________________________

FKonstantin said:

...



| For me, the issues are not policital, but technical:



Agreed. One of mine is that the surety of being able to drop a lower runlevel and back up is gone. I have always managed my systems the way I learned in the early days (probably from SunOS) where level 2 was multi-user no NFS, level 3 added NFS (and possibly more), and level 5 was a GUI.

Sometimes it is very handy​ to be able to go down one or more levels to make changes or solve problems, then come back up. And it's much faster than rebooting beefy modern servers with their extensive hardware checks (or even Fedora on an older home computer).

For whatever faults it had, SysVInit handled this as well for me over the years as whatever had been in BSD. systemd does not- at least within Fedora and RHEL and its rebuilds.



-Miles


ATOM RSS1 RSS2