SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

March 2016

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Eero Volotinen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Eero Volotinen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 9 Mar 2016 05:05:04 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (4 kB) , text/html (5 kB)
Do you have transparent/forced proxy in network?

Eero

ke 9. maaliskuuta 2016 klo 6.53 Thomas Leavitt <[log in to unmask]> kirjoitti:

> No feedback? Is everyone else just ignoring these messages?
>
> Thomas
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Thomas
> Leavitt
> Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:53 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: RE: "Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than
> what we have:"
>
> Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than what we have:
>   Current   : Tue Feb 16 08:58:20 2016
>   Downloaded: Tue Feb 16 08:58:13 2016
>
> A 7 second variance shouldn't be that much of an issue.
>
> Regards,
> Thomas Leavitt
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Leavitt
> Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:52 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: RE: "Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than
> what we have:"
>
> I've been meaning to write about this for a while... my inbox is flooded
> every day with messages with this as the content from my SL7 machines (the
> ones I have set up to forward mail sent to root). I checked the time on
> them, they're using NTP, and the time agrees, almost to the second, with
> that of network time services and other machines, I doubt there's even a 30
> second variance.
>
> What's the strategy for dealing with this? Seems like it isn't an isolated
> problem.
>
> Regards,
> Thomas Leavitt
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David
> Sommerseth
> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 2:51 AM
> To: Peter Boy; [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: "Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than
> what we have:"
>
> On 13/02/16 19:24, Peter Boy wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > since several months I  get constantly from anacreon:
> >> ——————————<
> > /etc/cron.daily/0yum-daily.cron:
> >
> > Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than what we have:
> > Current   : Thu Feb  4 16:13:26 2016
> > Downloaded: Thu Feb  4 16:13:25 2016
> >> ——————————<
> >
> >
> > The time difference is quite minimal. And a manual „yum update“
> > confirms that no updates are waiting.
> >
> > Using my favourite search engine I found it might have be caused by an
> > unresponsive of lazy mirror. But I use the standard configuration, i.e.
> > the mirror list just includes the three scientificlinux servers. Other
> > entries refer old bugs long fixed.
> >
> > I tried a yum clean all but it didn’t fix it.
> >
> > And all our other don’t show this issue, but the configuration is all
> > the same, at least according to my knowledge.
> >
> >
> > Obviously, there is no harm done and it can be safely ignored. But it
> > always pulls our issue alert button.
>
> Hi,
>
> I am seeing exactly the same.  I thought it was NTP issues related to my
> own setup, where I have a local rsync mirror.  But then I installed from
> scratch SL7 on another site without any local mirrors, and the same issue
> appears there too.  So I see this both with public repositories as well as
> local rsync repositories.
>
> I have also seen this on SL6, but not as frequent as on SL7.
>
> Even though they cause no obvious harm, it gets quite annoying when you
> receive many of them during a day ... sometimes even several days in a row.
>
> Perhaps yum should be more graceful to the timestamp?  And just quiet
> these messages if the time difference is less than 30 seconds or so.
>
>
> --
> kind regards,
>
> David Sommerseth
>
> --
> kind regards,
>
> David Sommerseth
> ________________________________
>
> This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information. If you are
> not the intended recipient: (1) you may not disclose, use, distribute, copy
> or rely upon this message or attachment(s); and (2) please notify the
> sender by reply e-mail, and then delete this message and its attachment(s).
> EAG, Inc. and its affiliates disclaim all liability for any errors,
> omissions, corruption or virus in this message or any attachments.
>
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2