SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

November 2009

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailling list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 8 Nov 2009 08:57:12 +0100
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Urs Beyerle <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject:
From:
Urs Beyerle <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
Comments:
To: Al Neumann <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Hi Al,

Al Neumann wrote:
> [...]
> Just not really sure what SL has been doing...  i.e: Where are those real
>
> scientific apps!!?
> Somewhat dismayed at the use of "scientific" in current SL.
> Al

I know that's confusing. And it's the most frequently ask question about
SL -> https://www.scientificlinux.org/documentation/faq/general1

Q. Where are all the 'science' programs?
Q. Is Scientific Linux better for scientific applications?

A. This linux distribution is called Scientific Linux because it is made
by scientific labs, for scientific labs and universities. It is not
named Scientific Linux because it has the largest collection of
scientific programs. It was named back when it was small, and only the
scientific labs were using it.

Cheers,

    Urs

ATOM RSS1 RSS2