SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 20:58:12 +1100
Reply-To:
Steven Haigh <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: NTP DOS issue?
From:
Steven Haigh <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aH04OjOi6LWGaAkcLW01dxMpdfFiOtJe4"
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
To: [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (506 bytes) , signature.asc (834 bytes) 
On 29/01/14 20:52, John Rowe wrote:
> I've been warned that my SL 5.9 machine is potentially vulnerable to the
> recently announced DOS attack. As far as I can see both my 5.9 and 6x
> machines are running vulnerable versions, am I missing something or are
> we vulnerable?

Any more details chief? I can give you an answer of pure guesswork - but
I certainly can't find anything new here....

-- 
Steven Haigh

Email: [log in to unmask]
Web: https://www.crc.id.au
Phone: (03) 9001 6090 - 0412 935 897
Fax: (03) 8338 0299

ATOM RSS1 RSS2