SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

May 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Zack Yovel <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Zack Yovel <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 25 May 2011 16:12:08 +0300
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2589 bytes) , text/html (3533 bytes)
2011/5/25 Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>

> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Zack Yovel <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > 2011/5/25 <[log in to unmask]>
> >>
> >> Zack Yovel writes:
> >>
> >>> « HTML content follows »
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Install SL6 on RAID 0 on GA-890GPA-UD3H (chipset: AMD SB850 )
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Does anyone know of a raid driver for this motherboard or chipset?
> >>
> >> Yes, it's called linux raid and it's probably 1000 times better/reliable
> >> than that fake raid.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Nux!
> >> www.nux.ro
> >
> > I don't think I like your tone! so here's for you:
> >
> >> In short - I have two disks, I want them both on raid 0, and I want
> >> dual-boot with windows.
> >
> > I'd appriciate it if you'd assume that I know about the obviouse, and
> that I
> > ask a specific question for a reason...
>
> Not everyone who asks actually knows the issues, and you're facing
> conflicting requirements. I assume you're using modern, bulky, SATA
> drives and want to use the onboard "I'm not really RAID, I just play
> one on TV" controller on that motherboard? And that you're aware of
> the awkwardness of setting aside an accessible "/boot" partition to
> boot with that does not require the software RAID drivers? And can we
> safely assume that you do *NOT* need the RAID0 for your Windows setup?
>
> If these are the case, I'm going to urge you to spend $30 on Ebay and
> save yourself a lot of awkward support time and buy a real SATA RAID
> card. I just went through this mess with OpenBSD and have been through
> it with Linux before: it's pesky, and I've dealt with people insisting
> that they really wanted their 40 TB array as a single RAID set, and
> dealing with the 16 TB limits of their 32-bit controllers, so I've
> been through some of the issues.
>
> What performance benefit are you expecting from RAID0 that justifies
> your investment in effort? Is it just the very large partition size
> available with merged, bulky partitions?
>

I do appreciate youre asking why I want it. So, I was thinking MB Raid and
not "Real" raid because I'm not going to spend no 30$ for Raid adapter.
Generaly I'm looking for the best solution available without spending more
mony.
I want raid 0 for the speed. MB raid wont give my any speed? maby, but I'd
like to see it with my own eyes...
So you say there is no sane solution for this situation (or none that you
know about?) fine, that answeres my question.
I can see you guys really don't like what I'm doing. You don't have to.
There is a part in "The Rock" where John Mason asks Stanley Goodspeed: "How
do you like your options?" and Goodspeed answers: "I don't".


ATOM RSS1 RSS2