 
| Sender: |
|
| Date: |
Sat, 29 Jan 2011 12:09:39 +0100 |
| MIME-version: |
1.0 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Content-type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=UTF-8 |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
| Comments: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 01/28/2011 03:04 PM, Bart Swedrowski wrote:
>
>
> On 28 January 2011 09:54, carlopmart <[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
> What can be better solution: CentOS, NexentaStor, openfiler, SL, Rhel5/6 ...??
>
>
> If that is going to be just one node, I would recommend going with ready solution
> like Openfiler or Nexenta.
>
> Pure CentOS 5 with iSCSI will do, too, but will be a bit more cumbersome to
> configure (which itself is pretty cool experience; you will learn about iSCSI etc.).
>
CentOS 5 or RHEL 5 as an iscsi server isn't an option, because scsi-target-utils has
many bugs that affects my infraestructure. CentOS 6 (when it is released) or RHEL6
maybe.
--
CL Martinez
carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com
|
|
|
