SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

August 2015

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for Scientific Linux developers worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 20 Aug 2015 09:31:20 -0400
Reply-To:
Lamar Owen <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Further breakage from rpm security upgrade
From:
Lamar Owen <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format=flowed
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
To: [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines) 
On 08/20/2015 03:44 AM, Paul Millar wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I previously reported that RPM building failed after the upgrade 
> because of changes to macros.
>
> I've just discovered another problem: after the upgrade, binary 
> payloads are compressed with xz (instead of gzip) and file digests use 
> SHA-256 by default, instead of MD5.
What versions of SL are we talking about here?  What version were you 
running, and what version are you running now?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2