Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 30 Sep 2005 18:50:09 +0200 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
multipart/signed; boundary=IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-disposition: |
inline |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 08:40:44AM +0200, Jan Iven wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 13:44 -0500, Connie Sieh wrote:
>
> > Do note that there is some expectation that RHEL 5 will be released late
> > 2006.
>
> Interesting, this certainly would affect release planning for CERN. Any
> pointers or insights?
> We've been told that RHEL5 <- FC5 <- FC4+rawhide <- FC4. The repository
> fork between FC4 and rawhide apparently has already happened.
Rawhide already forks off the to-be-released version even before the
actual release. The developent model is having rawhide as "HEAD" and
cutting Fedora Core releases out of rawhide every 6-9 months. The RHEL
releases are on an 18 month cycle and aretimes timed to be about half
an FC release cycle away from the latest RHL/FC release that they are
based on.
Until now FC releases were every 6 months, giving 3 FC release cycles
per RHEL release cycle, e.g. RH9 & RHEL3 , FC1, FC2, FC3 & RHEL4, FC4.
See also
http://www.redhat.com/software/rhelorfedora/
which quotes 18 months release cycles for RHEL and 4-6 months release
cycles for FC.
The FC development model will change to 9 months (still fits in RHELs
18 month cycle), so you will get two FC release cycles per RHEL
cycle, or you will get 3x9=27 month release cylces of RHEL.
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
|
|
|