SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

March 2017

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for Scientific Linux developers worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 29 Mar 2017 08:52:51 -0500
Reply-To:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Subject:
From:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
To: "aleksander.baranowski" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (52 lines)
Thanks for the report!

I uncovered an unrelated bug in libguestfs, but the repo error is new 
information.

I do show that version of libguestfs in the repo.

I'll see about double checking the repodata correctly synced up to the 
distribution servers.

Pat

On 03/29/2017 08:27 AM, aleksander.baranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tested SL 6.9 x86_64 with netimage
> [http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/x86_64/iso/SL-6-x86_64-netinstall.iso]
> you gave us.
>
> Installation was on libvirt/qemu/kvm.
>
> Installation process went as follow:
>
> 1) Test disc - OK
> 2) Select default options for network configuration in URL submenu
> 3) Put url
> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/x86_64/os/
> 4) Wait for retrieving install.img etc...
> 5) Wait for graphical installer. Next -> Install anyway (alpha/beta
> infobox).
> 6) Hostname sl69
> 6) Basic Storage Devices
> 7) Zone - Warsaw, then set root pass.
> 8) Use All Space twice, on third try I made manual partitioning.
> 9) Customize now -> Install all package group except language support,
> without adding optional packages in any group.
> 10) Install
> 11) There is error - "libguestfs-1.20.11-20.el6.x86_64.rpm cannot be
> opened. This is due to a missing file, a corrupt package or corrupt
> media. Please verify your installation source."
> Screenshot included.
>
> I tried on 3 different installation, (one with only 20 gb of disc space,
> so I make it bigger 40 gb, when same package had problem I thought that,
> this might be bug, but to be sure I made 50 gb installation with manual
> partitioning, same result)
>
> I would love to hear if anyone else can reproduce.
>
> Bests
> Alex

ATOM RSS1 RSS2