Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:57:24 +0200 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Dirk,
> On 24 Apr 2015, at 15:43, Dirk Hoffmann <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> On Apr 23, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
>> SL's kernels are simply rebuilt from the upstream (RHEL) kernel
>> source. So, it was Red Hat to decide to update the igxbe driver to
>> 4.0.1. I suspect it was backported from the latest stable kernel from
>> kernel.org (4.0).
>
> Thanks for that very quick answer!
>
> Any idea how I can look at the kernel sources (and hence the driver code in question)?
http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/7x/SRPMS/vendor/kernel-3.10.0-229.1.2.el7.src.rpm
> This:
> ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/7Server/en/os/README
> sends me to a page, where
> rpms/kernel
> rpms/kernel.git
> rpms//kernel
> rpms//kernel.git
> rpms/kernel/
> rpms/kernel.git/
> seem to be closest to what I need. But they end up showing the same contents and just a bogus multiplicity or misconfiguration of that server.
>
> However, the branches there ("c7" for CentoOS7) do not contain any substantial kernel sources, just some configuration stuff.
>
> I am lost. Any help will be appreciated.
> Dirk
>
>
> PS: I am likely to get this wrong, but:
> " - The kernel tarball inside the srpm is created from a git tree that is only accessible to Red Hat engineers."
> according to http://lwn.net/Articles/430098/
>
> Is SL really based on an "obfuscated" kernel tarball?????
If you want to call it that, yes.
Cheers,
Stephan
|
|
|