Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 5 Sep 2019 08:54:47 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
That is a good question!
I'll talk to folks internally about getting that set as "always security".
Pat
On 9/4/19 6:55 PM, Kraus, Dave (GE Healthcare) wrote:
> Random observation of the day - why is scap-security-guide not one of the packages that always goes into security when it is updated?
>
> Given that selinux updates are (per the FAQ), that is...
>
> I guess that selinux is more active at runtime, and scap-security-guide/openscap is passive might be a good argument. And the FAQ does cover it.
>
> Not trying to start any arguments, just wondering.
>
> Our spin is going into an LTM phase per a change in direction from our management, and revisiting the whole security updates for prior releases policy. And we do push use of openscap and the scap-security-guide, which gets good enhancements that should be backward compatible.
>
> Ah well, as I said, not trying to start an argument, and just something that sunk into my head today...
>
--
Pat Riehecky
Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
www.fnal.gov
www.scientificlinux.org
|
|
|