SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

October 2016

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for Scientific Linux developers worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 12 Oct 2016 16:14:44 -0600
Reply-To:
Orion Poplawski <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Subject:
Re: scl-utils-build in @buildsys-build
From:
Orion Poplawski <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
To: Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines) 
On 10/03/2016 08:01 AM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
> SL 6x should now be fixed.
> 
> Pat

Confirmed, thanks!


> On 09/30/2016 05:32 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> On 07/25/2016 11:04 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>> Scientific Linux lists "scl-utils-build" in the @buildsys-build group.  This
>>> causes problems trying to rebuild some EPEL6 rpms because of an
>>> incompatibility between the scl-utils rpm macros and EPEL6's implementation of
>>> a hack to support the %license macro.  RHEL6 does not contain scl-utils-build
>>> in the @buildsys-build group, so I think SL should drop it.
>>>
>> ping - this is a real problem for me.  Any comments?
>>


-- 
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager                     303-415-9701 x222
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office             FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane                       [log in to unmask]
Boulder, CO 80301                   http://www.nwra.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2