SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

November 2013

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for Scientific Linux developers worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 5 Nov 2013 03:13:40 +0000
Reply-To:
Alan Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Alan Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
To: Steven Haigh <[log in to unmask]> cc: SL-devel <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
On 5 November 2013 02:25, Steven Haigh <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On 5/11/2013 7:12 AM, Connie Sieh wrote:
>> On Mon, 4 Nov 2013, Stephan Wiesand wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like to humbly express my disapproval of habitually placing each
>>> and every SELinux policy "enhancement" in the security tree.

<snip>

>>> Which is why I'd much rather
>>> deploy it only in the course of a minor release update, or if there'd
>>> be a security flaw fixed, or if I knew it fixes a bug actually biting me.
>>>
>>
>>> Am I the only one feeling that way?
>>
>> Lets start a discussion on this.
>
> Do many people use SELinux in the enforcing mode?

Yes.

Alan.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2