SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

June 2018

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Date:
Mon, 11 Jun 2018 21:15:23 +0000
Reply-To:
"Kraus, Dave (GE Healthcare)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
glusterfs security updates?
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
base64
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Mailing list for Scientific Linux developers worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
From:
"Kraus, Dave (GE Healthcare)" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines) 
We seem to be missing at least a couple glusterfs package updates in SL compared to TUV’s security update notification.



From what I can tell, at least the last couple updates for 6 and 7 have not come through from SL for either the clients or the server sides:



For CVE-2018-1088:

   RHSA-2018:1136 (for SL7)

   RHSA-2018:1137 (for SL6)



For CVE-2018-1112

   RHSA-2018:1268 (for SL6)

   RHSA-2018:1269 (for SL7)



Might want to take a look and see what's going on (or tell me why I'm mistaken, which is more likely...).



Thanks for any insight...

ATOM RSS1 RSS2