SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

January 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jamie Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jamie Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 7 Jan 2014 19:54:04 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1063 bytes) , text/html (1956 bytes)
I see this as a good thing for Red Hat Enterprise Linux as well as its
downstream distributions.


On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Dag Wieers <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> On Tue, 7 Jan 2014, Lirodon wrote:
>
>  And I meant that as in, they're basically OPERATING it like how they do
>> Fedora; it's now run by a board that is organized by and running under Red
>> Hat. As Wikipedia says, "The Fedora Project is not a separate legal entity
>> or organization; Red Hat retains liability for its actions. The Fedora
>> Project Board is responsible for the direction of the Fedora Project and
>> comprises four Red Hat appointed members and five community-elected
>> members. Additionally, Red Hat appoints a chairman who has veto power over
>> any board decisi"
>>
>
> In comparison, the CentOS project today comprises 7 Red Hat employees out
> of 9 board members.
>
> --
> -- dag wieers, [log in to unmask], http://dag.wieers.com/
> -- dagit linux solutions, [log in to unmask], http://dagit.net/
>
> [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
>



-- 
Thanks,

Jamie Duncan
@jamieeduncan


ATOM RSS1 RSS2