Sender: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 7 Jun 2010 14:55:36 -0500 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Oleg Sadov wrote:
> 07/06/2010 13:15 -0500, Troy Dawson wrote:
>
>> *Kernel-modules
>> They are a necessary evil. How should we handle them on SL6
>>
>> *Yum Repositories
>> What should we have for default?
>> Should we still have "contrib"?
>> Should we add "development"?
>> Should we have yum-conf-epel? Or should that be a default repository?
>
> I think EPEL is a helpful resource in some cases. Of course, it's my be
> disabled by default for conflicts avoiding.
>
> Apropos, what do you think about ELREPO repository:
>
> http://elrepo.org/tiki/tiki-index.php
>
> It have a lot of useful packages with a device drivers, which not
> included to RHEL.
This brings up a thought that I was having.
1 - Switch from having a yum-conf rpm to having the default yum
repositories in sl-release, like the rest of the world.
2 - Remove all of the non-sl repositories out of the default yum
repositories (dag, atrpms, adobe), and then have *all* non-sl yum
repositories in their own rpm.
2a - We could name these yum-conf-<repo> such as yum-conf-dag,
yum-conf-elrepo and yum-conf-epel. But I'm up for giving them a
different name if everyone thinks something would be better.
3 - Have the yum priorities plugin installed by default, and all yum
repositories need to have a priority ranking.
Troy
--
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson [log in to unmask] (630)840-6468
Fermilab ComputingDivision/LSCS/CSI/USS Group
__________________________________________________
|
|
|