SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

March 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for Scientific Linux developers worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 25 Mar 2014 22:37:24 +0000
Reply-To:
Karanbir Singh <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Subject:
Re: SL / CentOS Request for Comment
From:
Karanbir Singh <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
To: Andras Horvath <[log in to unmask]>, Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]> cc: [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines) 
On 03/25/2014 12:48 PM, Andras Horvath wrote:
> Would this mean that the support of the minor branches would end and only the most recent minor version would get the long term support? If so, then I strongly believe that one of the most precious advantages of SL would disappear - compared to CentOS AFAIK.
> 
> 

How do these point releases map to RHEL point releases ? And what level
of testing is done to ensure sanity within that point release in SL ?

-- 
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

ATOM RSS1 RSS2