SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

June 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Maillling list for Scientific Linux developers worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Jun 2011 08:54:31 -0500
Reply-To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Subject:
Re: redhat-logos SRPM
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
In-Reply-To:
<1307095755.3577.14.camel@sadov-t>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
To: Oleg Sadov <[log in to unmask]> cc: scientific-linux-devel <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines) 
Hi Oleg,
I'm sorry about that, redhat-logos as well as httpd had both been put 
into the vendor directory.  I've moved them over and they are now where 
you would expect them to be.

http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/SRPMS/sl6-changed/

Troy

On 06/03/2011 05:09 AM, Oleg Sadov wrote:
> Kai, thank you for your answer, but it's Red Hat, not Scientific
> artwork. SL modified packages placed here:
>
> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/SRPMS/sl6-changed/
>
> But, unfortunately, only redhat-logos-60.0.14-1.sl6.1.src.rpm placed
> here, not redhat-logos-60.0.14-2.sl6.1 included in distribution.
>
>
> 03/06/2011 09:53 +0200, Kai Heide wrote:
>> http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Client/en/os/SRPMS/redhat-logos-60.0.14-1.el6.src.rpm
>>
>> 2011/6/2 Oleg Sadov<[log in to unmask]>:
>>> Hi Troy,
>>>
>>> Sorry to disturb you, but we can't find new redhat-logos SRPM. Can you
>>> help us?
>>>
>>> --Oleg


-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/SCF/FEF/SLSMS Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2