Sender: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:19:52 -0500 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Troy Dawson wrote:
> Hello,
> I have been wanting to update the kernel-module plugin for yum on SL5. I have
> it all ready in the testing area, and it does work so much better than the
> previous kernel module plugin.
> The problem is that it does not backport very well to yum 3.0 which is on SL
> 5.0 and 5.1. To keep things short there is a bug in yum 3.0 (and 2.4) that
> prevents the plugin's from fixing up dependancies when yum gets them wrong.
> This bug is fixed in yum 3.2 (which is what is in SL 5.2 and 5.3)
> So why would I worry about upgrading the old yum?
> Because along with bug fixes, there is a couple of feature changes. The
> biggest change is that yum 3.2 automatically has the installonlyn feature.
> This only keeps 'n' kernels on your machine.
> This works pretty good and I think many people will think it's great. But I
> don't know if everyone is going to like it, and they might be surprised by
> it.
> Anyway, I need opinions. Should I push the newer yum out to all of SL5?
> Or should I just push it out to SL 5.2 and 5.3?
And live with the bugs for 5.0 and 5.1 . Can you give more detail about
these bugs.
-connie sieh
>
> Troy
> --
> __________________________________________________
> Troy Dawson [log in to unmask] (630)840-6468
> Fermilab ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI LMSS Group
> __________________________________________________
>
|
|
|