Sender: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:16:06 +0200 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
Organization: |
CERN |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear all,
at the "Spring" Hepix conference in Karlsruhe, we had complaints that SL
wasn't "scientific" enough, i.e. was missing several packages.
I had contacted several developers to see whether they could make
+maintain SL versions (RPM+SRPM). Examples where there was some
willingness are OpenScientist and GSL, with ROOT and GEANT4 at least not
against the idea. I also have some things I prepared myself (xmgrace or
(eventually) a recompilable CERNLIB), which currently would go into the
CERN repository but are useful outside.
The question is where to store these - I don't want such things to
become "CERN"-additions, but to be available to the wider community. We
could put them into the CERN "extras" repository and then mirror (I
think Connie already takes things from there), but I think some specific
section on scientificlinux.org would be more appropriate (including
instructions for package authors).
?
Jan
|
|
|