SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

March 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for Scientific Linux developers worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 25 Mar 2014 13:48:37 +0100
Reply-To:
Andras Horvath <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Subject:
Re: SL / CentOS Request for Comment
From:
Andras Horvath <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
To: Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]> cc: [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (8 lines) 
Would this mean that the support of the minor branches would end and only the most recent minor version would get the long term support? If so, then I strongly believe that one of the most precious advantages of SL would disappear - compared to CentOS AFAIK.


On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:55:25 -0500
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Point releases (7.1, etc.) might disappear. Expect them to not.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2