SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

March 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format=flowed
Sender:
Mailing list for Scientific Linux developers worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Lamar Owen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 26 Mar 2014 09:36:04 -0400
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Lamar Owen <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
On 03/26/2014 09:32 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> ...
> This is a key difference between CentOS and SL, and for many it is a 
> value-add, even though it could potentially break strict binary 
> compatibility with upstream.
Oh, but I forgot to add:  it would also be interesting to see what the 
actual differences between an SL 6.1 with 
inside-the-point-release-updatess versus a 6.5 system that has been 
updated from 6.1 with only security updates applied.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2