SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

January 2008

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Maillling list for Scientific Linux developers worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:19:47 -0800
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Akemi Yagi <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject:
Re: nfs in 2.6.18-53.1.6
From:
Akemi Yagi <[log in to unmask]>
Content-disposition:
inline
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
Comments:
To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines) 
On Jan 31, 2008 12:13 PM, Glenn Morris <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
> > Just want to confirm one more thing. This issue is related to the
> > client kernel but not the server's. Is this correct?
>
> A .6 client with a .4 server (both x86_64) is noticeably slow, yes.
>
> It's a production server, so I can't as easily test a .4 client with a
> .6 server at the moment.

My test was with a 53.1.6 server (x86_64).  So, it looks almost
certain that the server kernel does not matter.

Johnny Hughes of CentOS filed a bug with the upstream bugzilla:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431092

Akemi

ATOM RSS1 RSS2