SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

December 2013

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for Scientific Linux developers worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:33:06 -0700
Reply-To:
Scott Dowdle <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Subject:
From:
Scott Dowdle <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Comments:
To: SL Devel <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Pat,

----- Original Message -----
> As part of SL6.5 we provide some glusterfs packages:
> 
> glusterfs-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
> glusterfs-api-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
> glusterfs-api-devel-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
> glusterfs-devel-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
> glusterfs-fuse-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
> glusterfs-libs-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
> glusterfs-rdma-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
> 
> These packages are what upstream provided as part of BA-2013-1641

Thanks for the info.

I believe anyone running a GlusterFS server is using the glusterfs-server package from epel and there is no upgrade for that.

As someone else responded, it looks like the fix for that is to add the repo provided by the gluster project.

TYL,
-- 
Scott Dowdle
704 Church Street
Belgrade, MT 59714
(406)388-0827 [home]
(406)994-3931 [work]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2