SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

October 2009

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Maillling list for Scientific Linux developers worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:59:42 +0200
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Florian La Roche <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject:
Re: Scientific Linux 5.4 RC 1 Release for i386 and x86_64
From:
Florian La Roche <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-disposition:
inline
Comments:
To: Chris Hunter <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines) 
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 12:35:45PM -0400, Chris Hunter wrote:
> Did CentOS win the race this time ?

Scientific Linux just has a slightly different release process.
It is available early as public beta/rc-release, overall both
are not really that much different...

> Keep up the good work! I prefer the Scilinux photos during install.

Right, that's one of the _major_ differences. ;-)

regards,

Florian La Roche

ATOM RSS1 RSS2