SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

August 2008

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Maillling list for Scientific Linux developers worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:23:37 +0200
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Stephan Wiesand <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
Subject:
From:
Stephan Wiesand <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Comments:
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (28 lines)
Hi Troy,

On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Troy Dawson wrote:

[...]
> As an extra precaution, I have just gone through our openssh source and done 
> comparison's of each file with both older, newest, and the openssh src.rpm 
> that was in question.  And everything is ok.
> There was no difference in any files except the spec files.
> The spec files were only changed in known, consistant ways.
> The newer src.rpm's had more patches, for bug and security fixes.  All of 
> these patches were documented on RedHat's site, and in the changelogs.
>
> I am very confident in saying that our version of openssh was NOT 
> compromised.

Huge thanks for performing this check, and for doing it so quickly.
I'm glad I was just paranoid.

Cheers,
 	Stephan

-- 
Stephan Wiesand
   DESY - DV -
   Platanenallee 6
   15738 Zeuthen, Germany

ATOM RSS1 RSS2