Axel Thimm wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> ATrpms is supporting several RHL/FC/EL distros and is currently
> reorganising them to a homogeneous layout under dl.atrpms.net, which
> carries both ATrpms packages, but also vendor "release" and "updates"
> packages, as well as upcoming other repos.
> 
> The layout is basically described at
> 
> http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-devel/2005-April/000696.html
> 
> The repo used for EL4 "release" and "updates" is scientificlinux. I'd
> like to ask, if I have been doing this sanely, or if I'm missing any
> bits (I'm using RH donated RHEL copies to build ATrpms' packages):
> 
> o http://dl.atrpms.net/sl${version}-$arch/scientificlinux/release
>   contains
>   ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/$versionx/$arch/SL/RPMS
> 
> o http://dl.atrpms.net/src/sl${version}-$arch/scientificlinux/release
>   contains
>   ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/$versionx/SRPMS/vendor/original
>   ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/$versionx/SRPMS
> 
> o http://dl.atrpms.net/sl${version}-$arch/scientificlinux/updates
>   contains
>   ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/$versionx/$arch/errata/SL/RPMS
> 
> o http://dl.atrpms.net/src/sl${version}-$arch/scientificlinux/updates
>   contains
>   ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/$versionx/SRPMS/vendor/errata
>   ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/$versionx/SRPMS
> 
> For the src.rpms it looks a bit like too much (including
> ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/$versionx/SRPMS in both), but
> I could not find "release" srpms separated from "updates", and it
> doesn't really hurt.
> 
> ($versionx is a map from 4->4x and 3->30x)

Hi Axel,
It looks like you have everything as far as I can tell.  I don't think 
anyone could install from that tree ... but it certainly would make yum 
and apt transactions much easier.

On a related note.  It looks like you are still moving things around, 
but where do you see the S.L. 3.x and 4.x compatible atrpms ending up 
at?  To me they look like they are at

http://dl.atrpms.net/el3-i386/atrpms/

and their comparable arch and distro places.  Is this where we should 
mirror?  Or do you see them changing to a different places such as

http://dl.atrpms.net/sl3-i386/atrpms/

Troy Dawson
-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/CSS  CSI Group
__________________________________________________