SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

August 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Mailing list for Scientific Linux developers worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 6 Aug 2012 23:42:59 +0400
Reply-To:
Elena Korytko <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Scientific Linux 6.3 Release Candidate 2 i386/x86_64 is now available for testing
From:
Elena Korytko <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Comments:
To: Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines) 
В Пнд, 06/08/2012 в 13:50 -0500, Pat Riehecky пишет:
> On 08/06/2012 10:20 AM, Elena Korytko wrote:
> > In some places of sl-release-notes-6.3.html presented 6.2 release. For
> > example:
> >
> > <H1>Scientific Linux 6.2</H1>
> >
> > URLs on "Iso Download area"
> When I take apart sl-release-notes-6.3-2.noarch.rpm, I don't see the 
> "<H1>Scientific Linux 6.2</H1>" string in there.  RC1 did have that 
> typo.  What version of the rpm did you find this in?

Sorry. It's was Release Candidate 1 

> > Seems like sl-release-6.3-1.src.rpm, sl-release-notes-6.3-1.src.rpm,
> > hsqldb-1.8.0.10-9.el6.src.rpm missed in sl-source
> > repo.
> Source rpms should be all synced up now.

Thanks

> Pat
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2