SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

January 2008

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Maillling list for Scientific Linux developers worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:39:09 -0600
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject:
openafs 1.4.6 as a security errata
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
Comments:
To: [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines) 
Howdy,
I always like to update the openafs along with a kernel security errata.  Well, 
there is a new kernel for SL 5, and I was going to release openafs 1.4.6 (which 
is the openafs in SL 5.1) as a security errata for the SL 5.0 folk.
Since this really is a openafs security update, I think it is the right thing 
to do.  But I just wanted to let anyone give any reason's why they think this 
is a bad idea.
Anyone see any reason's why not to update the openafs in SL 5?
What about SL 4?

Troy
-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI DSS Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2