SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

June 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Maillling list for Scientific Linux developers worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:19:08 -0400
Reply-To:
R P Herrold <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Subject:
Re: Proposed consortium for community EL development
From:
R P Herrold <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
To: Shawn Thompson <[log in to unmask]> cc: scientific-linux-devel <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (22 lines) 
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Shawn Thompson wrote:

> While we haven't quite ironed out the details, I am presuming this:
>
> -This would basically be what CentOS would be like if it had a
> community model more like ours.
> -Most likely, we will strive to be 100% compatible with RHEL.

.... that sounds like CentOS to me ;)

>> On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Shawn Thompson wrote:

>>> ... has proposed the formation of a  community
>>> consortium to help develop a common "meta-distribution" ...

I have no idea how some new: 'common "meta-distribution"' can 
also be: '100% compatible with RHEL'

Could you please elucidate what you are seeking to create?

-- Russ herrold

ATOM RSS1 RSS2