SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

November 2018

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for Scientific Linux developers worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 12 Nov 2018 09:05:54 -0600
Reply-To:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Subject:
Re: SL 7.6 BETA x86_64 is now available for testing
From:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
To: Orion Poplawski <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines) 
On 11/10/18 10:30 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 11/8/18 10:01 AM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
>> Scientific Linux 7.6 BETA x86_64
>>
>> These are the notes for the "BETA" of Scientific Linux 7.6
>>
> I haven't had a chance to try to figure out a cause yet, but some combination
> of the testing and 7.6 beta updates caused my EFI system to fail to boot due
> to a missing /boot/efi/EFI/scientific/grub.cfg file.  Perhaps it being moved
> from /boot/efi/EFI/redhat/grub.cfg?  Like I said though, just is just an
> initial report for others to be careful with their efi systems.  I was able to
> fix boot by booting to rescue media and then:
>
> grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/efi/EFI/scientific/grub.cfg
>

I think I found the issue.  I'll see about getting a fix out soon.

Pat


-- 
Pat Riehecky

Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
www.fnal.gov
www.scientificlinux.org

ATOM RSS1 RSS2