SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

June 2009

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Sender:
Maillling list for Scientific Linux developers worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
yum-updatesd versions and epochs
From:
Dr Andrew C Aitchison <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:39:39 +0100
MIME-version:
1.0
Comments:
To: [log in to unmask]
Reply-To:
Dr Andrew C Aitchison <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (12 lines) 
I note that the new test packages
5rolling/testing/i386/yum/yum-updatesd-3.0.6-4.sl.noarch.rpm
5rolling/testing/x86_64/yum/yum-updatesd-3.0.6-4.sl.noarch.rpm 
have no epuch, whereas the yum-updatesd-0.9-2.sl.noarch.rpm in
{52,53}/{i386,x86_64}/SL has epoch 1.

Are the new packages just for 50 and 51 ?

-- 
Dr. Andrew C. Aitchison		Computer Officer, DPMMS, Cambridge
[log in to unmask]	http://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~werdna

ATOM RSS1 RSS2