On 2017-04-11 09:44, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 11:13:25AM +0200, David Sommerseth wrote:
>>
>> But that aside, according to [1], ZFS on Linux was considered stable in
>> 2013.  That is still fairly fresh, and my concerns regarding the time it
>> takes to truly stabilize file systems for production [2] still stands.
>>
>
> Why do you worry about filesystem stability?
>
So I suppose the extended downtime while several terabytes of data are restored 
after it's loss due to filesystem malfunction is of no consequence to you. 
Others find extended downtime both extremely frustrating and expensive. And that 
does ignore the last few {interval between backups} worth of data loss, which 
can also be expensive.

{o.o}   Joanne