Hardly a showstopper, but some SRPMS haven't been signed:

6rolling/SRPMS/sl6/kmod-openafs-1.6.17-1.SL68.el6.src.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
6rolling/SRPMS/sl6/kmod-openafs-1.6.18-1.SL68.el6.src.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
6rolling/SRPMS/sl6/sl-release-6.8-1.0.rolling.src.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
6rolling/SRPMS/sl6/sl-release-6.8-2.0.src.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
6rolling/SRPMS/sl6/xorg-x11-server-1.17.4-9.5.sl6.src.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
6x/SRPMS/sl6/kmod-openafs-1.6.17-1.SL68.el6.src.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
6x/SRPMS/sl6/kmod-openafs-1.6.18-1.SL68.el6.src.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
6x/SRPMS/sl6/sl-release-6.8-1.0.rolling.src.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
6x/SRPMS/sl6/sl-release-6.8-2.0.src.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
6x/SRPMS/sl6/xorg-x11-server-1.17.4-9.5.sl6.src.rpm: sha1 md5 OK

> On 14 Jul 2016, at 00:32, Kraus, Dave (GE Healthcare) <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> And just to complete the conversation, after pulling from the freshened
> URLs, the results I see are much better. Provided Connie with the results
> file, noted a couple things that I couldnąt exactly explain, but nothing
> that canąt be solved before release.
> 
> Now awaiting the official announcement. :-)
> 
> On 7/13/16, 2:37 PM, "[log in to unmask] on
> behalf of Kraus, Dave (GE Healthcare)"
> <[log in to unmask] on behalf of
> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
>> Yeah, I know about email formatting. Still had to give it a try. :-)
>> 
>> Now that you mention it, I may not have updated the URLs for rc2. Iąll
>> blame being on vacation last week and reading the announcement without
>> sufficient coffee. :-)
>> 
>> Resyncing both bin and source trees as we speak. Iąll re-run against those
>> and report back ASAP.
>> 

-- 
Stephan Wiesand
DESY - DV -
Platanenallee 6
15738 Zeuthen, Germany