Hardly a showstopper, but some SRPMS haven't been signed: 6rolling/SRPMS/sl6/kmod-openafs-1.6.17-1.SL68.el6.src.rpm: sha1 md5 OK 6rolling/SRPMS/sl6/kmod-openafs-1.6.18-1.SL68.el6.src.rpm: sha1 md5 OK 6rolling/SRPMS/sl6/sl-release-6.8-1.0.rolling.src.rpm: sha1 md5 OK 6rolling/SRPMS/sl6/sl-release-6.8-2.0.src.rpm: sha1 md5 OK 6rolling/SRPMS/sl6/xorg-x11-server-1.17.4-9.5.sl6.src.rpm: sha1 md5 OK 6x/SRPMS/sl6/kmod-openafs-1.6.17-1.SL68.el6.src.rpm: sha1 md5 OK 6x/SRPMS/sl6/kmod-openafs-1.6.18-1.SL68.el6.src.rpm: sha1 md5 OK 6x/SRPMS/sl6/sl-release-6.8-1.0.rolling.src.rpm: sha1 md5 OK 6x/SRPMS/sl6/sl-release-6.8-2.0.src.rpm: sha1 md5 OK 6x/SRPMS/sl6/xorg-x11-server-1.17.4-9.5.sl6.src.rpm: sha1 md5 OK > On 14 Jul 2016, at 00:32, Kraus, Dave (GE Healthcare) <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > And just to complete the conversation, after pulling from the freshened > URLs, the results I see are much better. Provided Connie with the results > file, noted a couple things that I couldnąt exactly explain, but nothing > that canąt be solved before release. > > Now awaiting the official announcement. :-) > > On 7/13/16, 2:37 PM, "[log in to unmask] on > behalf of Kraus, Dave (GE Healthcare)" > <[log in to unmask] on behalf of > [log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> Yeah, I know about email formatting. Still had to give it a try. :-) >> >> Now that you mention it, I may not have updated the URLs for rc2. Iąll >> blame being on vacation last week and reading the announcement without >> sufficient coffee. :-) >> >> Resyncing both bin and source trees as we speak. Iąll re-run against those >> and report back ASAP. >> -- Stephan Wiesand DESY - DV - Platanenallee 6 15738 Zeuthen, Germany