Yeah, I know about email formatting. Still had to give it a try. :-) Now that you mention it, I may not have updated the URLs for rc2. I¡¯ll blame being on vacation last week and reading the announcement without sufficient coffee. :-) Resyncing both bin and source trees as we speak. I¡¯ll re-run against those and report back ASAP. On 7/13/16, 2:03 PM, "Connie Sieh" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >On Wed, 13 Jul 2016, Kraus, Dave (GE Healthcare) wrote: > >> (I don©öt know why I spent time fooling with formatting the below table >> because email will turn it into an even more random collection of >> gibberish, but oh well. And that©ös not exactly the diff output, but it >>is >> what it©ös supposed to be with proper alignment.) >> > >Email alignment is a art not a science :-) > >> Functionally, our spin is working well in our lab testing. >> >> Given that, my concerns move to making sure we have all the sources >> available, and according to my analysis, we seem to have some mismatches >> still in the package sets I'm finding. >> >> I hope the following is helpful... >> >> Test setup >> ---------- >> >> Package sets retrieved via reposync. >> >> Repo Definitions: >> ----------------- >> >> [build-sl] >> name=Scientific Linux 6.8 - x86_64 >> >>baseurl=https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=ftp-3A__linux1.fnal.go >>v_linux_scientific_6.8_x86-5F64_os&d=CwIDAw&c=IV_clAzoPDE253xZdHuilRgztyh >>_RiV3wUrLrDQYWSI&r=CmDw8B-62WZksFsoRmLNMpkmXUpJTRShxC5GC1b9aIA&m=N62nU4o6 >>wX3Q24pTVUvhUEb-Qo69MQRfoNbAT9ekEFU&s=LtH5nr6gyl2BSjpew33RpziMIHb28p8P3BK >>nAVsih4k&e= > >Can you try this with this url, the above url is a development version. >We are in rc2 now so the below url is what will be published tomorrow. > >baseurl=https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ftp1.scientifi >clinux.org_linux_scientific_6.8_x86-5F64_os&d=CwIDAw&c=IV_clAzoPDE253xZdHu >ilRgztyh_RiV3wUrLrDQYWSI&r=CmDw8B-62WZksFsoRmLNMpkmXUpJTRShxC5GC1b9aIA&m=N >62nU4o6wX3Q24pTVUvhUEb-Qo69MQRfoNbAT9ekEFU&s=9SYGGG7mFvzCLMoRb-31aU6QNjZyI >exK9efH1JSy5P8&e= > >> enabled=0 >> gpgcheck=1 >> gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-sl >> file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-sl6 >> file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-cern >> >> [build-sl-SRPMS] >> name=Scientific Linux 6.8 - x86_64 Sources >> >>baseurl=https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ftp1.scientif >>iclinux.org_linux_scientific_6.8_SRPMS_&d=CwIDAw&c=IV_clAzoPDE253xZdHuilR >>gztyh_RiV3wUrLrDQYWSI&r=CmDw8B-62WZksFsoRmLNMpkmXUpJTRShxC5GC1b9aIA&m=N62 >>nU4o6wX3Q24pTVUvhUEb-Qo69MQRfoNbAT9ekEFU&s=amK8W_IkRBSVzCyjzxfGIYh_Qa5TPH >>RqPG5xgukDZyw&e= > >I have updated the following with the latest SRPMS > >baseurl=https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ftp1.scientifi >clinux.org_linux_scientific_6x_SRPMS_&d=CwIDAw&c=IV_clAzoPDE253xZdHuilRgzt >yh_RiV3wUrLrDQYWSI&r=CmDw8B-62WZksFsoRmLNMpkmXUpJTRShxC5GC1b9aIA&m=N62nU4o >6wX3Q24pTVUvhUEb-Qo69MQRfoNbAT9ekEFU&s=oj_u3FAxWd1vq1yjs8ldh9qlwVx6Tdggk3H >fZ2ViF7U&e= > >> enabled=0 >> gpgcheck=1 >> gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-sl >> file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-sl6 >> file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-cern >> >> Reposync Commands: >> ------------------ >> >> reposync -c scripts/yum.conf -r build-sl --norepopath -t -n >> >> reposync -c scripts/yum.conf -r build-sl-SRPMS --norepopath -t -n >> >> Analysis: >> --------- >> >> >> ls *.rpm | xargs -n 1 rpm -qp --qf "%{SOURCERPM}\n" | sort -u > >> /tmp/bin64src.txt >> find SRPMS -type f -name \*.src.rpm -exec basename \{\} \; | sort -u > >> /tmp/srcs.txt >> diff -y --suppress-common-lines /tmp/bin64src.txt /tmp/srcs.txt | tee -a >> /tmp/srcdiffs.txt >> > >I ran our SRPM verify program against our tree and did not find so many >issues. That SRPM tree is not what you see so I have rsync'ed out >our SRPMS tree to 6x/SRPMS/ > >-connie