Seriously lets take the high frequency trading thing off this list and any one else who wants to talk to me as well a out it, I'm perfectly happy to explain it.
Further more I'm willing to explain the real problems with the world financial system but not on this list and certainly not on this thread



-- Sent from my HP Pre3


On Aug 24, 2014 8:55 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 7:50 PM, jdow <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> The stock exchange could remove most of the problem, meaning high
> frequency trades, by placing a purely random 0 to 1 second latency
> on all incoming data and all outgoing data. The high frequency trading
> reads to me as just another means of skimming now that they're not
> allowed to round down fractional pennies and pocket the change. It's
> time to give mere mortals some practical access to the exchanges. And
> this interest in microsecond clocks would simply vanish from the
> exchanges.

The whole high frequency trading, low latency mess is due to leave the
Linux world, at least for the hosts directly receiving the data, due
to the availability of FPGA's that can live on fiber optic
connections, physically adjacent to the stock market. I can say that
based on interviews I did some years back, without a signed NDA for
the interviews, and based on press articles on the technology.

Generating the rules for the FPGA's, now, *that* is an interesting
potential Linux market, and I can point people to job ads for
precisely this. Tying it back to Scientific Linux, I'd *love* to see
them using Scientific Linux for this due to the support available from
the Scientific Linux world for oddball scientific computing
requirements. And the Scientific Linux built-in integration for 3rd
party repositories like EPEL and ATrpms is invaluable.

> On a different point, the word I can find is that the free version of
> VMWare does not support this "high latency sensitivity" setting.
>
> {o.o} Joanne, Just sayin'

Cool thanks for looking into it!