On 8/30/2014 12:02 PM, Yasha Karant wrote: > On 08/30/2014 03:50 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 12:16 AM, Yasha Karant <[log in to unmask]> >> wrote: >>> Is there any workaround for the issue below other than moving to SL >>> 7 (once >>> that release goes into production from beta)? >>> >>> ykarant@jb344 Downloads]$ /usr/bin/AfterShotPro2X64 >>> Install Path: /opt/AfterShotPro2(64-bit) >>> LD_PATH: /opt/AfterShotPro2(64-bit)/lib: >>> XLIB_SKIP_ARGB_VISUALS: 1 >>> ./AfterShotPro: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found >>> (required >>> by /opt/AfterShotPro2(64-bit)/lib/libstdc++.so.6) >>> ./AfterShotPro: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.17' not found >>> (required >>> by /opt/AfterShotPro2(64-bit)/lib/libstdc++.so.6) >>> ./AfterShotPro: /opt/AfterShotPro2(64-bit)/lib/libuuid.so.1: no version >>> information available (required by /usr/lib64/libSM.so.6) >>> [ykarant@jb344 Downloads]$ >>> >>> Yasha Karant >> Since it's commercial software, maybe you could ask *them*? > I already have. As Corel (which bought Bibble -- strange -- if > corporations are people, and corporations can buy other corporations, > why cannot non-incorporated real human people buy other > non-incorporated real human people -- perhaps because corporations are > not people but merely engines of avarice) effectively was bought by > Microsoft a number of years ago, their technical support for Linux is > not superb. Otherwise, Corel would keep (as does VirtualBox owned by > Oracle, a parent corporation that competes with Red Hat for EL > for-profit "support") versions around that are in fact directly > compatible with most distros. Interestingly, the IA-32 version (32 bit > linux) runs fine under IA-32 SL 6x. > > Speaking of which, is there any other workflow package that works as > well or better directly under Linux (I do not mean Photoshop under MS > Windows under VirtualBox under Linux -- I do mean native)? I have > tried gimp, but the import facilities for imaging vendor proprietary > image formats ("raw", e.g., Nikon NEF) is not as effective. I do not > run Mac OS X (a typical image manipulation environment) because none > of our primary machines (both fixed workstations as well as laptops) > are sold by Apple and thus it is software piracy in the USA to run Mac > OS X on such machines (Apple will not sell a license for Mac OS X for > non-Apple machines ) -- otherwise Mac OS X with fink or the equivalent > might be a solution. > > Yasha Karant This might be a case where another distribution will fit your needs better. Does Corel have a list of supported OSes you can reference? -Mark