On 25/03/14 08:55, Connie Sieh wrote: > > We would like your opinion on the following. > > 1. SL choices: > > 1. status quo > "SL binaries" built local > "RHEL binaries" built local > "compose" is done local This. Don't forget, the reason that a lot of folks I know switched to SL in the first place was that the CentOS community is overflowing with.... I can't find a polite way to put this other than refer to a certain male reproductive organ. This goes for bug reports, forums, IRC channels and mailing lists. imho, the SL community excels at what it does and should not be 'merged' with CentOS just because it seems to be the in thing to do. I do realise the benefits, but please realise that the SL team are the ones that really brought credit to the SL name and developed the community. Losing that to become a CentOS clone is far from a successful outcome imho. -- Steven Haigh Email: [log in to unmask] Web: https://www.crc.id.au Phone: (03) 9001 6090 - 0412 935 897 Fax: (03) 8338 0299