"so RH wants to get new versions of selected apps faster to the RHEL than
if they were going thru current Fedora -> RHEL route?
am i reading this right?"

no, not at all, I don't think.


On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Andrew Z <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> so RH wants to get new versions of selected apps faster to the RHEL than
> if they were going thru current Fedora -> RHEL route?
> am i reading this right?
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 10:07 PM, ~Stack~ <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> On 01/07/2014 08:27 PM, Steven Haigh wrote:
>> > On 8/01/2014 1:08 PM, Steven Miano wrote:
>> >> So how does that impact Scientific Linux?
>> >
>> > In a nutshell? It doesn't.
>>
>> I don't think it will hurt Scientific at all and from what I have been
>> reading it might make things easier and better. I (as a non-dev user, so
>> take this opinion accordingly) see two things that might help:
>> 1) the hidden process of how CentOS rebuilds the SRPMs is being opened
>> up which should make CentOS even close to their binary-equivalent goal.
>> 2) the variant ( http://centos.org/variants/ ) might actually make
>> things easier if Scientific just wanted to start with a core base and
>> build from there. I am sure there are going to be a dozen different
>> spin-offs of CentOS for this reason alone.
>>
>> There are still a TON of details yet to be given, so we will see what is
>> actually delivered, but this is great news for the community as a whole.
>> Here is hoping that it makes things easier and better! Cheers!
>>
>>
>> ~Stack~
>>
>>
>


-- 
Thanks,

Jamie Duncan
@jamieeduncan