And I meant that as in, they're basically OPERATING it like how they do Fedora; it's now run by a board that is organized by and running under Red Hat. As Wikipedia says, "The Fedora Project is not a separate legal entity or organization; Red Hat retains liability for its actions. The Fedora Project Board is responsible for the direction of the Fedora Project and comprises four Red Hat appointed members and five community-elected members. Additionally, Red Hat appoints a chairman who has veto power over any board decisi"


On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 6:23 PM, Jamie Duncan <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
CentOS cannot equal Fedora, plain and simple.

Fedora is upstream, CentOS is downstream. 

???


On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Lirodon <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
In my opinion, even though they don't call it as such, I'd call it an Acqui-hire. CentOS is basically Fedora now, a commercial operation masquerading with the structure and appearance of a non-profit.They're promising a more open atmosphere, but thenagain...


On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Jamie Duncan <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Jimmy Dorff <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
This is interesting:

http://community.redhat.com/centos-faq/





--
Thanks,

Jamie Duncan
@jamieeduncan





--
Thanks,

Jamie Duncan
@jamieeduncan