And I meant that as in, they're basically OPERATING it like how they do
Fedora; it's now run by a board that is organized by and running under Red
Hat. As Wikipedia says, "The Fedora Project is not a separate legal entity
or organization; Red Hat retains liability for its actions. The Fedora
Project Board is responsible for the direction of the Fedora Project and
comprises four Red Hat appointed members and five community-elected
members. Additionally, Red Hat appoints a chairman who has veto power over
any board decisi"


On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 6:23 PM, Jamie Duncan <[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> CentOS cannot equal Fedora, plain and simple.
>
> Fedora is upstream, CentOS is downstream.
>
> ???
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Lirodon <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> In my opinion, even though they don't call it as such, I'd call it an
>> Acqui-hire. CentOS is basically Fedora now, a commercial operation
>> masquerading with the structure and appearance of a non-profit.They're
>> promising a more open atmosphere, but thenagain...
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Jamie Duncan <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> http://community.redhat.com/centos-faq/?utm_content=buffer6403d&utm_source=buffer&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Buffer
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Jimmy Dorff <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This is interesting:
>>>>
>>>> http://community.redhat.com/centos-faq/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Jamie Duncan
>>> @jamieeduncan
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> Jamie Duncan
> @jamieeduncan
>
>