And I meant that as in, they're basically OPERATING it like how they do Fedora; it's now run by a board that is organized by and running under Red Hat. As Wikipedia says, "The Fedora Project is not a separate legal entity or organization; Red Hat retains liability for its actions. The Fedora Project Board is responsible for the direction of the Fedora Project and comprises four Red Hat appointed members and five community-elected members. Additionally, Red Hat appoints a chairman who has veto power over any board decisi" On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 6:23 PM, Jamie Duncan <[log in to unmask]>wrote: > CentOS cannot equal Fedora, plain and simple. > > Fedora is upstream, CentOS is downstream. > > ??? > > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Lirodon <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> In my opinion, even though they don't call it as such, I'd call it an >> Acqui-hire. CentOS is basically Fedora now, a commercial operation >> masquerading with the structure and appearance of a non-profit.They're >> promising a more open atmosphere, but thenagain... >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Jamie Duncan <[log in to unmask]>wrote: >> >>> >>> http://community.redhat.com/centos-faq/?utm_content=buffer6403d&utm_source=buffer&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Buffer >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Jimmy Dorff <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>> >>>> This is interesting: >>>> >>>> http://community.redhat.com/centos-faq/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Jamie Duncan >>> @jamieeduncan >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Thanks, > > Jamie Duncan > @jamieeduncan > >