Can I ask for a bit of info as to why you've got objections?

The yum-conf-sl6x package is included by the comps.xml, and not required 
by any packages.

This makes it easy to remove via yum and easy to disable in kickstart 
via '-yum-conf-sl6x'.

For HELiOS, it shouldn't get in the way.....

Pat

On 10/18/2013 02:44 PM, Brown, Chris (GE Healthcare) wrote:
>
> I second that objection ;-) **grin**
>
> *From:*[log in to unmask] 
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of 
> *Schaaf, Jonathan P (GE Healthcare)
> *Sent:* Friday, October 18, 2013 2:40 PM
> *To:* Pat Riehecky
> *Cc:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* RE: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL] SL 6.x enabled as repository 
> in 6.4
>
> Can I object now? :-)
>
> *From:*Pat Riehecky [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> *Sent:* Friday, October 18, 2013 2:37 PM
> *To:* Schaaf, Jonathan P (GE Healthcare)
> *Cc:* [log in to unmask] 
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> *Subject:* Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL] SL 6.x enabled as repository 
> in 6.4
>
> On 10/18/2013 02:20 PM, Schaaf, Jonathan P (GE Healthcare) wrote:
>
>     I couldn't help but notice that yum-conf-sl6x-1.2 is installed as
>     part of a default install of SL 6.4... is this a new "normal" or
>     just something that was done accidentally while building 6.4?
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Jonathan
>
>
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> When 6.4 was in beta there was a question about making '6x' enabled by 
> default.  No one objected.  This change is noted in the Release Notes.
>
> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6.4/x86_64/os/sl-release-notes-6.4.html#DiffSL6
>
> Pat
>
> -- 
> Pat Riehecky
>   
> Scientific Linux developer
> http://www.scientificlinux.org/


-- 
Pat Riehecky

Scientific Linux developer
http://www.scientificlinux.org/