Can I ask for a bit of info as to why you've got objections? The yum-conf-sl6x package is included by the comps.xml, and not required by any packages. This makes it easy to remove via yum and easy to disable in kickstart via '-yum-conf-sl6x'. For HELiOS, it shouldn't get in the way..... Pat On 10/18/2013 02:44 PM, Brown, Chris (GE Healthcare) wrote: > > I second that objection ;-) **grin** > > *From:*[log in to unmask] > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of > *Schaaf, Jonathan P (GE Healthcare) > *Sent:* Friday, October 18, 2013 2:40 PM > *To:* Pat Riehecky > *Cc:* [log in to unmask] > *Subject:* RE: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL] SL 6.x enabled as repository > in 6.4 > > Can I object now? :-) > > *From:*Pat Riehecky [mailto:[log in to unmask]] > *Sent:* Friday, October 18, 2013 2:37 PM > *To:* Schaaf, Jonathan P (GE Healthcare) > *Cc:* [log in to unmask] > <mailto:[log in to unmask]> > *Subject:* Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL] SL 6.x enabled as repository > in 6.4 > > On 10/18/2013 02:20 PM, Schaaf, Jonathan P (GE Healthcare) wrote: > > I couldn't help but notice that yum-conf-sl6x-1.2 is installed as > part of a default install of SL 6.4... is this a new "normal" or > just something that was done accidentally while building 6.4? > > Thanks, > > Jonathan > > > Hi Jonathan, > > When 6.4 was in beta there was a question about making '6x' enabled by > default. No one objected. This change is noted in the Release Notes. > > http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6.4/x86_64/os/sl-release-notes-6.4.html#DiffSL6 > > Pat > > -- > Pat Riehecky > > Scientific Linux developer > http://www.scientificlinux.org/ -- Pat Riehecky Scientific Linux developer http://www.scientificlinux.org/